Whoop 4.0 vs. Oura: Which screenless health tracker do you have to wear?

You would like a health, wellness, and fitness tracker that doesn’t have a screen? Then you definitely can be clever to contemplate the Oura Ring and the Whoop 4.0, as neither will hassle you with notifications or show you the time. But each have extensive health-tracking capabilities and in-depth apps, all for an identical price.

I’ve worn the Oura Ring for greater than a yr now, and have used the Whoop 4.0 wristband for about six weeks, so I’ve got a very good idea of how the 2 compare. Which do you have to spend your money on? Let’s discover.

Wearing the Oura Ring and Whoop 4.0

Andy Boxall/Digital Trends

I wear the Oura Ring on the center finger of my right hand, and the Whoop 4.0 on the identical wrist. For reference, I’m wearing the third-generation Oura Ring Horizon model. Wearing smart jewelry just like the Oura Ring is the final word in convenience, as when you’re used to it in your finger, you’ll mostly forget it’s there (it’s just barely larger and thicker than a non-smart ring, but you’ll feel it between your fingers for the primary few days). I wear mine 24 hours a day and really rarely find it bothersome. After I do, it’s doing things that require me to grip a solid object like a dumbbell, or when performing tasks where I don’t wish to risk any damage, like washing a automotive.

The Whoop 4.0 avoids these situations because it’s on my wrist. It’s very lightweight at 27 grams, but that’s still heavier than the 6-gram Oura Ring. The material strap never gets sweaty and hasn’t irritated my skin either, and I also wear it 24 hours a day. It seems to dry out in a short time, too, so even when it gets splashed, I’ve never needed to take it off since it became itchy. The actual “brain” of the Whoop 4.0 is encased in metal and is kind of thick, although I even have not found it gets in the best way of blouse sleeves greater than most traditional watches. You can even purchase specially designed undergarments to carry the Whoop.

Putting the Oura Ring on a finger.Andy Boxall/Digital Trends

Along with being very different products — a hoop and a wristband — in addition they have very different styles. The Whoop 4.0 is most definitely a sporty product, and although it will possibly hide under a cuff, when it’s exposed, it has a really casual look. The Oura Ring just isn’t sporty. It goes with every thing and really does a very good job of mixing in, so it never becomes the focus. Yes, the polished silver is kind of eye-catching, but from a distance, it just looks like a standard ring. How each looks is something to contemplate depending on your individual personal style.

It’s this mixture of convenience and unobtrusive style that makes me prefer the Oura Ring to the Whoop 4.0. I can wear it with every thing and it looks great — plus. it never fights for attention after I’m wearing a watch on my left wrist. The Whoop 4.0 does, because it’s obvious I’m wearing something on each wrists. Which you favor will come all the way down to personal preference, but the nice thing here is that neither is annoying or uncomfortable to wear long-term.

What concerning the sensors, battery, and charging?

The side of the Whoop 4.0 on a person's wrist.Whoop 4.0 Andy Boxall/Digital Trends

On the back of the Whoop 4.0 is a five-LED health sensor with red, green, and infrared light that tracks your heart rate and blood oxygen levels, plus your skin temperature. Through the info collected, it’ll also show heart rate variability (HRV), resting heart rate (RHR), and respiratory rate. The third-generation Oura Ring uses LEDs with red, green, and infrared light. It measures heart rate, blood oxygen, and skin temperature, plus shows RHR and HRV.

Each have menstrual tracking systems, however the Oura Ring includes period prediction and likewise links with the Natural Cycles app, where body temperature data might be used for greater accuracy. It’s a manual system on the Whoop 4.0 using the Whoop Journal feature, and there’s no partnership with Natural Cycles or one other app. Nevertheless, each the Oura Ring and the Whoop 4.0 integrate with Strava for exercise tracking.

The Whoop 4.0 with the charging pack attached.Whoop 4.0 with charging pack attached Andy Boxall/Digital Trends

The Whoop 4.0’s charging system is unnecessarily complicated. It comes with a conveyable battery pack that slides onto the Whoop’s body after it has been charged individually, so the battery might be topped up without removing the band. Nevertheless, this setup is large and cumbersome. It’s purported to make it easy to make use of when out and about, but I’ve never felt the necessity to do that. If the battery pack gets lost, you may’t charge the Whoop band either, so it’s dangerous too. Alternatively, it will possibly be left plugged right into a wall charger and attached to the Whoop.

It takes a few hours to completely charge, and the battery lasts about 4 days. In case you track a number of workouts, then you definitely’ll get even less trip of it. The charging system and battery life are pretty poor for a tool that doesn’t have a screen.

The Oura Ring on its charging dock.Andy Boxall/Digital Trends

The Oura Ring’s battery lasts longer, between five and 7 days, depending in your usage. You set the ring on a special plinth to charge it, and this works rather well. I normally put it on charge after I’m within the shower, keeping it topped up, so I never have to completely charge it.

The neat, sensible, and logical way of charging the Oura Ring is a giant profit. And while it provides the identical level of health tracking through its sensor array because the Whoop 4.0, it beats its rical with Natural Cycles integration — which can be quite helpful to some.

The Oura app is all about well-being and ease

Screenshots showing the Oura Ring's app and data.

Oura Ring Andy Boxall/Digital Trends

Screenshots showing the Oura Ring's app and data.

Oura Ring Andy Boxall/Digital Trends

Screenshots showing the Oura Ring's app and data.

Oura Ring Andy Boxall/Digital Trends

The Oura Ring takes your data and separates it into three most important sections: Sleep, Activity, and Readiness. There are different goals to set, starting from stress, health, and athletic performance to being more productive or energetic. There’s also a Rest Mode for whenever you desire a break, the choices of hiding calorie burn or using steps as a day by day goal, and many charts to indicate current and historical information. Finally, under the Explore menu, there are multiple mindfulness exercises and meditational sessions to encourage sleep, learning, and respiration.

The Oura Ring’s app isn’t overly complicated or hugely feature-packed.

It’s all logically laid out, the colour scheme is straightforward on the eyes, nothing is especially complicated to seek out, and it’s at all times obvious the way you slept and the way your body is ready for the day ahead. Your key stats are presented using an easy 1-to-100 scale, so that you don’t have anything recent to learn. You’ll be able to track workouts through the app, but only walking, running, and cycling, either indoors or out. The Oura Ring’s app isn’t overly complicated or hugely feature-packed, but what it does feature is expertly designed and presented, making it suitable for everybody.

Oura doesn’t push you to satisfy goals, and as an alternative gives all the knowledge needed to make a choice yourself. Nevertheless, it does suggest bedtimes and tells you for those who should rise up and move around a bit. Depending in your goal, the app tells you which of them metrics to concentrate on, and easy methods to read the continuing trends. The app is superb at showing these, helping you understand how your body and well-being are changing. Don’t expect the Oura Ring to offer you masses of drive to exit and run a marathon — it’s not likely about that. It puts the concentrate on you and your well-being and enables you to make decisions based on them. I actually like this aspect.

Whoop’s app pushes you to your limit

whoop 4 vs oura ring 40 screens 3

Whoop 4.0 Andy Boxall/Digital Trends

Screenshots showing the Whoop 4.0's app and data.

Whoop 4.0 Andy Boxall/Digital Trends

Screenshots showing the Whoop 4.0's app and data.

Whoop 4.0 Andy Boxall/Digital Trends

The Whoop 4.0’s app could be very different from the Oura Ring’s app. While the Oura Ring is more about well-being, the Whoop 4.0 is more about activity and fitness, and it pushes you greater than the Oura. If fitness gains are your goal, then the Whoop 4.0 is certainly going to suit you. Aside from the wealth of exercise modes to trace, it does this by putting emphasis on a metric it calls Strain.

Strain is its gauge of how much it’s good to push yourself to satisfy a day by day goal, and it’s balanced by Recovery, which is worked out when the wristband tracks your sleep. The app shows Strain and Recovery on the most important page, with sleep and activity data underneath. You’ll be able to dig into every one individually, but in comparison with Oura’s app, there may be a number of tapping, swiping, and exploring to be done. It’s not as logically laid out, and while there are masses of information inside, you actually must explore to seek out all of it.

The Whoop 4.0 is more about activity and fitness, and it pushes you greater than the Oura.

It’s easy to see how much Strain the app recommends, however it’s less clear what you’d must do with a purpose to meet the Strain goal. It takes time to learn the way much Strain you may amass by doing certain activities. While Strain is the important thing day by day metric, you may select long-term goals, equivalent to being healthier or getting fitter. The mindfulness features present in Oura’s app are missing from the Whoop app, where the emphasis is on community, teams, and putting time into setting the suitable goals for you.

Use the Whoop for greater than a month, and also you get an in-depth report in your stats, which could be very informative — data-hounds will love the possibility to avoid wasting it as a PDF and print it out. Oura sends a monthly report, however it’s friendlier and fewer graph-heavy than the Whoop app — again showing how far more performance-orientated the Whoop is. The Whoop app is slower than the Oura ring, because it performs a number of its data processing within the cloud. It has also been less reliable, and sometimes prompts me to open the app so it will possibly “catch up.”

How much will you pay? It’s complicated

Whoop's website when buying the Whoop 4.0Digital Trends

It’s not only a case of paying a single price and living happily ever after along with your Whoop or Oura Ring, as each have a subscription to pay so that you proceed to see and profit out of your data. The Oura Ring’s cost is the simplest to grasp. The ring starts at $300, depending on the style and finish you select, and it comes with a single month’s “membership” included. After that, it costs $6 per 30 days. In case you determine to not pay, all you see is a Sleep, Readiness, and Activity rating, plus a number of the basic Explore content. It really works, but only just.

You don’t buy the Whoop 4.0, you “join” it. The hardware is free unless you select a elaborate strap, which may cost as much as $100 upfront, then you definitely opt to pay for access to the app monthly (with a 12-month contract), annually, or for 2 years. Monthly it costs $30, an annual membership costs $300, and a two-year membership costs $480, so you may lower your expenses by committing for an extended time period. In case you stop paying, you not have access to the app, and the hardware becomes useless.

For 2 years, the Oura Ring will cost $438, assuming you select the most cost effective ring, making it just a little cheaper than the Whoop 4.0 for those who paid upfront for 2 years. Pay monthly for the Whoop 4.0 for a similar period of time, and it’ll cost an enormous $720. In case you’re going to purchase the Whoop 4.0, it’s less expensive to commit to using it for an extended time frame.

Which one will I keep using?

Whoop 4.0 band alongside the Oura Ring.Andy Boxall/Digital Trends

I don’t wish to wear each the Oura Ring and the Whoop 4.0 on a regular basis, so which one will I select? It’s an easy decision for me, and it’s the Oura Ring. It’s more convenient to wear, it looks great, the info suits me, I don’t find it irritatingly motivational, the app is fast and well-presented, and it’s cheaper to make use of long-term than the Whoop 4.0. The battery lasts longer, and the charging method is less complicated too.

Nevertheless, if I used to be really into fitness and had goals that revolved around increasing it and improving my performance, the Oura Ring wouldn’t suit me. It’s where the Whoop 4.0 is available in, as every thing from the band and app design to the metrics used are more focused on activity. Nevertheless, the associated fee of ownership could be very high for what you get, and runners or cyclists may find just as much (if no more) profit from a Garmin or Polar wearable.

The Oura Ring and Whoop 4.0 are very similar products hardware-wise, but goal quite different people. Before deciding which one is correct for you, establish what you hope to get from wearing a health and fitness tracker over the following two years. In case you aren’t absolutely sure about your goals, and even wondering for those who’ll still be wearing it in two years’ time, then consider an easy fitness tracker or smartwatch that doesn’t have a subscription attached to it before jumping into certainly one of these.

Today’s tech news, curated and condensed on your inbox

Check your inbox!

Please provide a sound email address to proceed.

This email address is currently on file. In case you will not be receiving newsletters, please check your spam folder.

Sorry, an error occurred during subscription. Please try again later.

Editors’ Recommendations

We will be happy to hear your thoughts

Leave a reply

Elgin Shopping Mall
Compare items
  • Total (0)
Shopping cart